Consumer
Case Studies
|
| Delhi
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New
Delhi |
| |
| JD
Kapoor, President; Mahesh Chandra & Rumnita Mittal,
Members |
| |
| Neelam
Chaturvedi - Appellant |
| Versus |
| MGF
(India) Ltd - Respondent |
| |
| Appeal
No. 163 of 1996 |
Decided
on 13.12.2004 |
|
|
Consumer
Protection Act, 1986 - Section 2(1)(g) - Deficiency in service
- Agreement for purchase of motor vehicle - Initial payment
of Rs. 23,400/- made and balance in equal installments -
Entire amount paid by Complainant - Respondent declined
to issue 'No Objection Certificate' - View taken by District
Forum that lease agreement was for two years, thereafter
Respondent was entitled to take back possession of vehicle
erroneous - Respondent guilty of deficiency in service -
Impugned order set aside.
Appeal allowed. |
|
IMPORTANT
POINT
Seller
held guilty of deficiency in service and unfair trade practice
for not issuing 'No Objection Certificate' after receipt
of full amount of vehicle. |
|
ORDER |
|
JD
Kapoor, President - The complaint
of the Appellant was dismissed vide impugned
order dated 23.2.1994/8.4.1994 solely on
the ground that the Appellant is not entitled
to the relief sought by her, as the hire-purchase
agreement entered into between the parties
does not entitle her to any relief on account
of deficiency in service on the part of
the Respondent. |
|
|
2. |
Admittedly,
the Appellant entered into an agreement
with the respondent for the purchase of
motor vehicle by paying initial amount of
Rs. 23,400/- and the balance in equal monthly
installments. The delivery of the vehicle
was made to her on 30.6.1987, the date of
agreement. In spite of the fact that the
entire payment by way of instalments was
made by the Appellant, the Respondent declined
to issue 'No Objection Certificate' for
transfer of the vehicle in her name. The
District Forum interpreted the hire-purchase
agreement as a lease agreement for the period
of two years whereafter the Respondent was
entitled to take back the possession of
the said vehicle.
|
|
|
3. |
The
view taken by the District Forum is entirely
erroneous and not in terms of the hire-purchase
agreement. It is not understandable as to
how the Respondent would become the owner
of the vehicle after having received the
full amount of the cost of the vehicle by
way of initial deposit of Rs. 23,400/- and
the remaining amount paid by way of instalments.
Therefore, no other alternative is left
with the Respondent but to provide 'No Objection
Certificate' for transfer of the vehicle
in question in the name of the Appellant
and by not doing so, the Respondent is guilty
of deficiency in service and unfair trade
practice.
|
|
|
4. |
In
view of the aforesaid reasons, we allow
the appeal and set aside the impugned order.
In the result, the complaint is allowed
with directions to the Respondent to furnish
No Objection Certificate within one month
for transfer of the vehicle in the name
of the Appellant, otherwise Transport Authority
shall transfer the registration in favour
of Appellant.
|
|
|
5. |
FDR/Bank
Guarantee, if any, deposited by the Appellant
be returned to the Appellant forthwith under
proper receipt.
|
|
|
6. |
A
copy of this order, as per the statutory
requirements, be forwarded to the parties,
free of charge also to the concerned District
Forum and thereafter the file be consigned
to the Record Room.
|
|
|
|
|
|