Truck
Sales and Truck Rentals Stray
After remaining firm for a year and half, truck rentals
decline by 3%-5% in four weeks during Apr-May’07. The sales
of new trucks also decline in Apr’07 because truckers are
extra cautious in fleet expansion
Background
The High Speed Diesel (HSD) prices in last one year (Jun’06
to May’07) have, by and large, remained benign since the
Public Sector Oil Companies had reduced the diesel price
by Rupee one each per litre during Nov’06 and Feb’07, neutralising
the Rupee-two-per-litre hike of Jun’06. However, other major
operating cost component, i.e. tyres became costlier by
14% - 15% during Feb-Jun’06 and continue to remain firm.
The diesel and tyres constitute 90% of the truck operating
expense in 60:40 ratio.
In the aftermath of Supreme Court order (Nov’05) to stop
overloading of trucks in accordance with provisions of the:
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the truck rentals shot up by 18%-20%
during Dec’05-Jan’06 and did not relent thereafter for 12-14
months i.e. till Mar’07. The increase in cargo movement,
truck rentals and freight realisation has been backed by
10%-11 % growth in manufacturing sector, over 8% growth
in GDP, 20%-25% rise in import-export trade and booming
construction industry. All this contributed to the automobile
industry witnessing over 30% growth in the sales of goods
vehicles (5 ton-49 ton capacity). The high tonnage trucks/trailers,
in fact, grew by over 75% during the last fiscal.
Truck Rentals/Freightage
Contrary to the expectations in many quarters, the current
fiscal has begun on a negative note with truck rentals,
after remaining robust for a long stretch of 18 months,
dropping, due mainly to weak arrival of seasonal fruits,
vegetables and wheat crop from different markets. Table-1
explains the truck rental movement during 5th Apr’07 to
5th May’07:
1. |
As
the Table-1 shows, after a year and half buoyant
truck rental market, the 4-week period from 5th
April to 5th May has witnessed a 3% - 5% drop in
rentals on trunk routes.
|
|
|
2. |
The
resumption of overloading of trucks in most parts
of the country has began to put pressure on truck
freightage/rentals on medium and long haul, while
the main reason for steep rise of 18%-20% in truck
rentals during Dec’05-Feb’06 was sudden curb on
overloading of trucks in the aftermath of 9 Nov’05
Supreme Court Order that directed strict implementation
of the provisions of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and
the offloading of cargo from trucks which were found
to be carrying in excess of the prescribed weight
limit. Slowly, the effect of Apex Court Order on
trucking industry has started to evaporate, leading
to the pre-Nov’05 situation.
|
Table-1
: Truck (16.2 Ton GVW) Rentals (Rs. Per round trip
during 5th Apr to 5th May'07 |
| Trunk
Route |
4-Week
Rental
Movement
(Per Round Trip) |
Truck
Rental
Decline
(per Round Trip)
Period
5th April-5th May 2007 |
Diesel
Price
(Per round trip)
during April/May 2007 |
Round
Trip /
9-ton payload |
Freightage
5th April'07 |
Freightage
5th May'07 |
Rs. |
% |
| Delhi-Mumbai-Delhi |
39,500 |
38,300 |
(-)
1,200 |
(-)
3.04% |
No
Change |
| Delhi-Nagpur-Delhi |
39,400 |
38,200 |
(-)
1,200 |
(-)
3.05% |
No
Change |
| Delhi-Kolkata-Delhi |
44,800 |
43,600 |
(-)
1,200 |
(-)
2.68% |
No
Change |
| Delhi-Guwahati-Delhi |
93,200 |
88,300 |
(-)
4,900 |
(-)
5.25% |
No
Change |
| Delhi-Hyderabad-Delhi |
59,000 |
56,800 |
(-)
2,200 |
(-)
3.72% |
No
Change |
| Delhi-Chennai-Delhi |
79,200 |
75,800 |
(-)
3,400 |
(-)
4.29% |
No
Change |
| Delhi-Bangalore-Delhi |
64,200 |
61,600 |
(-)
2,600 |
(-)
4.05% |
No
Change |
| Delhi-Ranchi-Delhi |
44,000 |
42,200 |
(-)
1,800 |
(-)
4.09% |
No
Change |
| Delhi-Raipur-Delhi |
41,400 |
39,500 |
(-)
1,900 |
(-)
4.59% |
No
Change |
| Delhi-Kandla-Delhi |
27,300 |
26,300 |
(-)
1,000 |
(-)
3.66% |
No
Change |
| Delhi-Bilaspur-Delhi |
41,600 |
39,500 |
(-)
2,100 |
(-)
5.05% |
No
Change |
3. |
Despite
double digit manufacturing growth, as also the robust
GDP growth, phenomenal rise in import- export trade
and booming construction industry, the unprecedented
75% growth in high tonnage trucks and multi-axle
trailers has created more that adequate cargo haulage
capacity. Therefore, excess truck fleet is chasing
relatively less cargo, putting pressure on truck
rental market for the last 4-6 weeks.
|
|
|
4. |
The
truck fleet has moved into and is presently engaged
in intra-state haulage to ferry wheat procurement
in various States, especially in Punjab, Haryana,
Eastern Rajasthan, Western Uttar Pradesh and Madhya
Pradesh. The truck rentals are likely to come under
more pressure after the truck fleet reverts to move
inter-state cargo. However, massive entry of multi-axle
trucks in trucking business provides tensile strength
to truck owners to take on lower truck rentals and
still operate profitably in the present business
scenario.
|
Truck Sales Reversal
As for the truck sales, the new fiscal has started off on
a not-so-happy note. The month of Apr’07 witnessed a significant
drop in sales for light trucks (5 ton - 7.5 ton capacity),
intermediate trucks (7.5 ton -12 ton capacity), medium trucks
(16.2 ton capacity) and multi-axle trucks (25.2 ton capacity),
with an exception of multi-axle truck trailers (30 ton -
49 ton capacity). Table-2 explains the current market situation.
Table-2
: Truck & Trailer Sales - A Comparative Trend (April
Month) |
| Sl.
No. |
Category/
Segment |
Sales
Fig in
(Apr'06) |
Sales
Fig in
(Apr'07) |
Difference
in nos. |
%
Difference |
| a.) |
Light
Commercial
Vehicle (LCV)
(5-7.5 ton capacity) |
2,369 |
2,214 |
(-)
155 |
(-)
6.64% |
| b.) |
Intermediate
Comm. Vehicle (ICV)
(8-12 ton capacity) |
2,082 |
2,044 |
(-)
38 |
(-)
1.82% |
| c.) |
Medium
Commercial
Vehicle (MCV)
(15-16.2 ton capacity) |
4,254 |
3,642 |
(-)
612 |
(-)
14.38% |
| d.) |
Multi
Axle Vehicle (MAV)
(25.2 ton capacity) |
8,654 |
7,709 |
(-)
945 |
(-)
10.91% |
| e.) |
Multi
Axle Trailer/
Vehicle (MAT)
(30-49 ton capacity) |
1,706 |
1,805 |
(-)
99 |
(+)
5.80% |
| |
Gross
Total : a.) + b.)
+c.) + d.) + e.) |
19,065 |
17,414 |
(-)
1,651 |
(-)
8.65% |
a) |
It
is pertinent to note that Apr’05 truck sales aggregated
10,804 units, while Apr’06 sales at 19,065 units
were up by a whopping 76.46%. However, in Apr’07,
the sales are down to 17,414 units, dropping by
8.65% from the sales figure of April’06.
|
|
|
b) |
In
Table-2, it can be seen that except for multi-axle
trailers, all other four segments have recorded
negative growth. Even in case off multi-axle trailers,
the meagre 5.80% growth is a pale shadow of the
growth pattern of last year.
|
|
|
c) |
In
addition, the most growing segment of 3-axle multi-axle
truck (25.2 ton capacity) has registered a negative
growth after their continuous growth for the last
4-years.
|
|
|
d) |
The
steep increase in truck auto finance rates during
Jan-Mar’07 by banks and NBFCs has been one of the
factors in putting brake on the sales of commercial
vehicles during Apr’07. However, the most important
factor depressing the market sentiment has been
the truckers sensing the uncertain availability
of cargo in these months due to seasonal factors.
The present high auto finance interest rates hovering
around 6.5%-7% as against 4.5% last year should
not act as a major deterrent in expanding their
fleet if there is a corresponding freight growth,
because the multi-axle goods vehicles still enjoy
higher margins in comparison to traditional 2-axle
16.2 ton trucks due to lower cost of operation.
|
Migration to High Tonnage Trucks
In last 4-5 years, the trucking industry has been in the
expansion mode inducting multi-axle high tonnage trucks
and moving away from traditional 2-axle 16.2 tonner trucks.
This has been accompanied with buoyant truck rentals despite
steep increase in diesel price since Jun’02 from Rs. 14.90
per litre to Rs. 30.45 per litre due to rising crude oil
price from $22 per barrel to $66 per barrel in the global
market. This was largely possible due to robust industrial
growth & rising GDP. Table-3 explains the growth scenario
in truck sales in 2005-06 and 2006-07:
Table-3
: Truck & Trailer Sales - A Comparative Trend (Annual) |
Sl.
No. |
Category/
Segment |
Volume/
Capacity |
Sales
Fig in
2005-06
(Apr-May) |
Sales
Fig in
2006-07
(Apr-May) |
Difference
in nos. |
Per
Cent
Difference |
| a.) |
Light
Commercial
Vehicle (LCV)
(5-7.5 ton capacity) |
Numbers |
40,024 |
36,410 |
(-)
3,614 |
(-)
9.02% |
| Ton
(million) |
0.200 |
0.182 |
(-)
0.018 |
(-)
9.02% |
| b.) |
Intermediate
Comm. Vehicle (ICV)
(8-12 ton capacity) |
Numbers |
32,200 |
36,187 |
(-)
3,987 |
(+)
12.38% |
| Ton
(million) |
0.290 |
0.326 |
(+)
0.036 |
(+)
12.38% |
| c.) |
Medium
Commercial
Vehicle (MCV)
(15-16.2 ton capacity) |
Numbers |
61,989 |
63,087 |
(+)
1,098 |
(+)
1.77% |
| Ton
(million) |
0.930 |
0.946 |
(+)
0.016 |
(+)
1.77% |
| |
Sub-total:
a.)+b.)+c.)
(LCV+ICV+MCV) |
Numbers |
133,213 |
135,684 |
(+)
2,471 |
(+)
1.85% |
| Ton
(million) |
1.420 |
1.454 |
(+)
0.034 |
(+)
0.024% |
| d.) |
Multi
Axle Vehicle (MAV)
(25.2 ton capacity) |
Numbers |
74,054 |
122,509 |
(+)
48,455 |
(+)
65.43% |
| Ton
(million) |
1.851 |
3.063 |
(+)
1.212 |
(+)
65.13% |
| e.) |
Multi
Axle Trailer/
Vehicle (MAT)
(30-49 ton capacity) |
Numbers |
11,080 |
25,579 |
(+)
14,499 |
(+)
107.27% |
| Ton
(million) |
0.499 |
1.151 |
(+)
0.652 |
(+)
107.27% |
| |
Sub-total:
d.)+e.)
(MAV+MAT) |
Numbers |
85,134 |
148,088 |
(+)
62,954 |
(+)
73.95% |
| Ton
(million) |
2.350 |
4.214 |
(+)
1.864 |
(+)
79.32% |
| |
Gross
Total : a.) + b.)
+c.) + d.) + e.) |
Numbers |
218,347 |
283,772 |
(+)
65,425 |
(+)
29.96% |
| Ton
(million) |
3.770 |
5.668 |
(+)
1.898 |
(+)
50.34% |
1. |
The
above table clearly explains that the major expansion
in the truck fleet came from the high tonnage 25-49
ton capacity vehicles only after the impact of Supreme
Court on truck freight market was severely felt.
This resulted in the generation of unprecedented
demand for movement of high density cargo like cement,
steel, fertiliser, food grain, pulses, timber, iron
ore etc.
|
|
|
2. |
During
last quarter of fiscal 2006-07 (Jan-Mar’07), the
extra demand for these vehicles was more on account
of availing Depreciation Allowance under the Income
Tax Act to neutralise the business profit by the
corporates and big transporters. The truck market
had, in fact, begun to saturate as truck fleet expansion
was indiscriminately more than the pro-rata increase
in cargo availability in last six months of the
fiscal 2006-07.
|
|
|
3. |
As
a whole, the goods carriages have added almost 1.9
million ton cargo haulage capacity in one single
year, which works out to 50.34% growth. In case
of multi-axle vehicles, the capacity accretition
has been phenomenal to the extent of 73.95%. At
present, there are 1.2 million goods vehicles in
25 ton - 49 ton capacity range with National Permits
operating on medium and long haul, carrying and
moving bulk cargo akin to the Railways in size,
dimension and weight. In fact, 25 ton - 49 ton capacity
multi-axle goods carriages enjoy almost 40%-50%
less per ton per km capital and operating cost in
comparison to traditional 16.2-tonner 2-axle trucks
and hence have been main source of higher profits
and realisation to truckers in last 4-5 years.
|
With phenomenal fleet expansion having already taken place,
the drop in truck sales during April 2007 is a sign that
the trucking industry is heading towards uncertainty. This
may result in unsettled and uncertain truck rental market
in coming months, which will have bearing on the growth
of truck sales. It cannot be ignored that there has been
a massive expansion in the national fleet. Truck operators
have, perhaps, overreacted in the buoyant scenario contributed
by healthy economic growth and hectic pace of commercial,
industrial and construction activities. Already, the vehicle
manufacturers have started offering discounts on sale of
different categories of trucks/trailers to retain the market
share and it is expected that the banks/NBFCs with support
from vehicle manufacturers will soon fall in line to reduce
interest rates on truck finance. After 4-5 years of uninterrupted
buoyancy, the truck sales are beginning to enter the uncertain
phase, unless the economy moves into the next gear very
fast. The continuing high level of inflation in the economy
is another negative factor, which is likely to impact the
growth of truck sales. Higher inflation translates into
lower disposable incomes in the hands of common people and,
consequently, lower demand for various manufactured items
and commodities.
|
| |
|